On June 27, 2018, the Supreme Court decided Janus v. AFSCME, overturning Abood v. Detroit Board of Education and restoring ...

On Labor Day, grandstanding union bosses aren’t likely to be extolling the rights of those hardworking employees who disagree with their agenda. But just as pro-union employees deserve a right to ...

Seven years after the U.S. Supreme Court’s Janus v. AFSCME decision established that public employees cannot be compelled to pay union dues, a troubling pattern has emerged: unions nationwide are ...

In the five years since the Supreme Court’s ruling in Janus v. AFSCME that public sector workers cannot be forced to pay union dues, many unions have adopted a novel legal strategy in response: ...

A much-needed labor reform ruling handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court eight years ago is being rendered ever more meaningless by the day as the justices continue to squander opportunities to defend ...

In 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court humbled public sector union officials accustomed to taking advantage of the public employees they were supposed to serve. In Janus v. AFSCME, the court overturned a ...

Your editorial “Oregon Punishes the Freedom Foundation” (Dec. 29) hits home. I thought Janus v. Afscme settled the issue that no government can force workers to fund unions they don’t support. I was ...

Forging Ahead in an AI-Infiltrated Entry-Level Job Market Obergefell, Eleven Years On The Supreme Court’s Fourth Amendment Expectations Are Unreasonable The Declaration of Independence as Law The ...

On the C-SPAN Networks: Mark Janus is a Lead Plaintiff with four videos in the C-SPAN Video Library; the first appearance was a 2018 Call-In. Most appearances with Jacob Huebert (3). Most common tags: ...

Billionaire-funded special interest groups are once again taking to the Penn Live opinion section to attack public employees and their unions. Meanwhile, AFSCME Council 13 is on the rebound as members ...