What is the difference between failover vs high availability?
May 29, 2015 · A part of high availability is failover which we define as the ability for client connections to migrate from one server to another in event of server failure so client applications can continue to …
Always On Failover Clustering vs Always On Availability Groups
Oct 9, 2018 · Is the Always On Clustering same as Windows server clustering? Yes you are correct. Always on clustering means you have created availability groups on database (s) which is part of …
What is the difference between Failover Clustering and AlwaysOn ...
Jan 29, 2016 · AlwaysOn FailOver Clustering (FCI) is associated with Windows Services FailOver Clustering (WSFC). This is a High Availability (HA) scenario where two (or more) servers share a …
I would like to understand better the difference between "sql server ...
Oct 15, 2019 · The WSFC service manages the failover of the SQL Instance and Shared Disks between nodes to provide high availability and disaster recovery. The SQL Server service for that instance …
sql server - Clustering vs. transactional replication vs. availability ...
As a developer and not a DBA, I am struggling to understand when to use which scenario for my failover / high availability: Two (or more) servers in a Windows Failover cluster, SQL Server as a clustered …
sql server - Always On FCI vs Always On Availability Groups - Database ...
May 9, 2018 · 3 What is the advantage of Always On Failover Clustering vs Always On Availability Groups? Basic Always On Failover Clustering provides server level protection, (eg: 2 servers with 1 …
What is the purpose of failover group for Azure SQL if it already is ...
Oct 13, 2018 · According to documentation below, Azure SQL databases are already a high-availability service. If that's the case, then what is the purpose of configuring failover groups?
Why is there automatic failover for HA and manual failover for DR?
Oct 19, 2020 · Since 'high availability' is usually planned and 'disaster recovery' is not, shouldn't we aim for manual failover in 'high availability' scenarios? What's the point of having automatic failover for …
High Availability(HA) vs Fault Tolerance - Stack Overflow
Jun 16, 2017 · As you can see, aspects of high availability like having multiple servers/instances lend themselves to fault tolerance, and fault tolerance measures prevent common failures from causing …
availability groups - Are "Always On Failover Cluster Instances" and ...
Apr 20, 2017 · I'm a little bit confused. In previous version of SQL Server (like SQL Server 2008) there is a technology called SQL Server Failover Clustering, is it the same thing as Always On Failover …